Talk:Radical feminism: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:48, 2 September 2019 edit imported>SW10048 →smh ← Older edit		Revision as of 13:48, 2 September 2019 edit undo imported>SW10048 →smh Newer edit →
Line 3:		Line 3:
	This group is extremely biased. While Third Wave isn't exactly a glowing repersentation of feminism, it isn't really considered evil. If this should be allowed, then there should be the history on why it has come to be in the first place, and the 'evil doing' that brought us feminism. Just my opinion.		This group is extremely biased. While Third Wave isn't exactly a glowing repersentation of feminism, it isn't really considered evil. If this should be allowed, then there should be the history on why it has come to be in the first place, and the 'evil doing' that brought us feminism. Just my opinion.

	think Radical feminism is evil. Think of it as an evil version of Marmite, which is known for being hated by some and loved by others. Only I like marmite because it doesn't discriminate or call all men "toxic", "misogynistic" or "potential rapists".--[[User:Xbsv\|Xbsv]] ([[User talk:Xbsv\|talk]]) 11:17, August 26, 2019 (UTC)		I think Radical feminism is evil. Think of it as an evil version of Marmite, which is known for being hated by some and loved by others. Only I like marmite because it doesn't discriminate or call all men "toxic", "misogynistic" or "potential rapists".--[[User:Xbsv\|Xbsv]] ([[User talk:Xbsv\|talk]]) 11:17, August 26, 2019 (UTC)