Talk:Ted Bundy: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 06:42, 2 July 2022

Protection edit

This article is a stub, lacking quite a bit of information. So why is it protected? Also, the link is quite biased, and a more neutral one would be http://www.pureintimacy.org/f/fatal-addiction-ted-bundys-final-interview/—%7C%7C Grudgeholderr ||— 06:26, February 6, 2018 (UTC).

Looking at the history it was protected for an edit war in 2014. I don't know why but nobody ever seems to unprotect pages on this wiki. Giffany (talk) 17:10, February 6, 2018 (UTC)

Should I message an admin?—|| Grudgeholderr ||— 17:52, February 6, 2018 (UTC)

Might be a good idea. Jeffrey Dahmer has also been protected for nearly two years. Giffany (talk) 20:02, February 6, 2018 (UTC)

I got promoted to admin today so I did it. :) Giffany (talk) 01:48, February 8, 2018 (UTC)

Yay! Congrats and thank you!—|| Grudgeholderr ||— 04:33, February 8, 2018 (UTC)

affably evil or faux affably evil? edit

someone can explain me how ted bundy are in the affably evil category and in the faux affably evil at the same time?

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 ::::I got promoted to admin today so I did it. :) [[User:.GIFfany Ramirez-McSkirmish|Giffany]] ([[User talk:.GIFfany Ramirez-McSkirmish|talk]]) 01:48, February 8, 2018 (UTC)
 :::::Yay! Congrats and thank you!—|| [[User:Grudgeholderr|<span style="color: turquoise; font-weight:bold; text-shadow: -0.5px 0 blue, 0 0.5px blue, 0.5px 0 blue, 0 -0.5px blue; font-family:Rock Salt, Chller, Courier; cursor: not-allowed;">Grudgeholderr</span> ]] ||— 04:33, February 8, 2018 (UTC)
+== affably evil or faux affably evil? ==
+someone can explain me how ted bundy are in the affably evil category and in the faux affably evil at the same time?