Talk:World War I: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
imported>Emmette Hernandez Coleman No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
2. Good and evil fought on both sides. | 2. Good and evil fought on both sides. | ||
:As you said, evil fought on both sides. I'm not so sure that good fought on both sides (except in the since that soldiers are good), but I'll accept that for the sake of the argument. In large groping like this, Good vs Good and Evil vs Evil are not mutually exclusive. [[User:Emmette Hernandez Coleman|Emmette Hernandez Coleman]] ([[User talk:Emmette Hernandez Coleman|talk]]) 17:19, August 28, 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:19, 28 August 2014
Evil vs Evil
Why was Category:Evil vs Evil removed? Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 06:10, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
1. Because it was all hell on both sides.
2. Good and evil fought on both sides.
- As you said, evil fought on both sides. I'm not so sure that good fought on both sides (except in the since that soldiers are good), but I'll accept that for the sake of the argument. In large groping like this, Good vs Good and Evil vs Evil are not mutually exclusive. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 17:19, August 28, 2014 (UTC)