User talk:Crayzee Dawg 101: Difference between revisions
imported>Buddyrichiedonmoochie |
imported>Buddyrichiedonmoochie →Nicolae Ceausescu: new section |
||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
[[User:Buddyrichiedonmoochie|Buddyrichiedonmoochie]] ([[User talk:Buddyrichiedonmoochie|talk]]) 12:40, November 18, 2012 (UTC) | [[User:Buddyrichiedonmoochie|Buddyrichiedonmoochie]] ([[User talk:Buddyrichiedonmoochie|talk]]) 12:40, November 18, 2012 (UTC) | ||
== [[Nicolae Ceausescu]] == | |||
Oh good. It was the [[Nicolae Ceausescu]] page he blanked anyway | |||
[[User:Buddyrichiedonmoochie|Buddyrichiedonmoochie]] ([[User talk:Buddyrichiedonmoochie|talk]]) 17:01, November 18, 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:01, 18 November 2012
Welcome
Hi, welcome to Real Life Villains Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the Adolf Hitler page.
Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- AmethystKnight (Talk) 03:34, September 22, 2012
Ivan lost his mother to the boyars when he was a kid, and assassination plots against him were not uncommon, plus he suffered a breakdown when his wife died, so I think he qualifies as a tragic villain, since he initially intended to be a good ruler when she was alive (he claimed to have received a message from God, telling him not to neglect his people). Also, if "Fanatic" is "all that's needed", then why are both Categories on the other Villains wiki? Ivan's religion was his obsession, but fanaticism and religion aren't always the same.Pyromania101 (talk) 22:21, October 12, 2012 (UTC)
No, the "Religious Villains" page WAS deleted on Villains Wiki. However, he still had some control on all his deaths, but maybe i'll add that back. However, its still debatable. Crayzee Dawg 101 (talk) 22:31, October 12, 2012 (UTC)
Oh, I didn't know they did. Huh. Thanks for informing me, though if you think about it, being religious, again, is not always the same as fanatacism.Pyromania101 (talk) 23:04, October 12, 2012 (UTC)
No, but a Fanatic is by Villains Wiki definition a person or organization that uses religion for extremism. Crayzee Dawg 101 (talk) 23:11, October 12, 2012 (UTC)
That doesn't always have to be the definition, though, but if it really bothers you, go ahead and petition for the termination of the Religious Villains page on this site (which I created).
Most Evil
You should check out these Discovery Channel documentaries called "The Most Evil Men and Women in History."
- Caligula
- Nero
- Attila the Hun
- Bad King John
- Tomas de Torquemada
- Francisco Pizarro
- Elizabeth Bathory (or Countess Dracula)
- Bloody Mary Tudor
- Vlad the Impaler
- Ivan the Terrible
- Rasputin
- Josef Stalin
- Adolf Hitler
- Ilse Koch
- Pol Pot
- Idi Amin
They can all be found on YouTube, except Bathory. I'm kinda disappointed they didn't include Mao, but I guess they didn't want to get too controversial.Pyromania101 (talk) 01:38, October 22, 2012 (UTC)
Most Evil
Kony and Al-Bashir should also be added, along with Islam Karimov
Elizabeth Bathory
She only went after buxom, beautiful virgins because she wanted to "steal their beauty." Adolescent and prepubescent girls were of no interest to her. Also, she was, ironically, a very good mother, so I don't see how she fits the bill of "Child Abuser." I don't wanna argue, but I'd like to see some facts, and I for one think it's a fact that she didn't kill small kids.
It is very likely i believe that she killed many small peasent children, also that she likely killed over 2000 people. Also, the fact that it was common at that time to kill peasent girls did not make it any better. Plus, it said "girls" which is a bit confusing. Crayzee Dawg 101 (talk) 22:26, October 22, 2012 (UTC)
She killed 650 women, or around that number. I guess the term "girls" implied teenage females, or basically any female who was starting to show signs of being a physical jewel. Many of her victims were "hired" as servants in their mid-teens or a bit older, but never as young children.Pyromania101 (talk) 23:01, October 22, 2012 (UTC)
Teen murdering still counts as a child murderer or child abuseCrayzee Dawg 101 (talk) 00:08, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
Graham Young
Hi Crayzee Dawg 101. You put Graham Young under the absolute evil category. Why?
I believe I put him under there due to his method of killing, and plus he killed his OWN family. Normally, the category is not used for serial killers unless they are excessively brutal.Crayzee Dawg 101 (talk) 16:38, November 17, 2012 (UTC)
I see
Buddyrichiedonmoochie (talk) 12:40, November 18, 2012 (UTC)
Nicolae Ceausescu
Oh good. It was the Nicolae Ceausescu page he blanked anyway
Buddyrichiedonmoochie (talk) 17:01, November 18, 2012 (UTC)