User talk:General MGD 109: Difference between revisions

imported>Lee-Sensei
No edit summary
How I see it: new section
 
(20 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Welcome==
==Welcome==
Hi, welcome to {{SITENAME}}! Thanks for your edit to the '''Genghis Khan''' page.
Hi, welcome to {{SITENAME}}! Thanks for your edit to the '''Genghis Khan''' page.
Line 16: Line 17:
*Disrespects other users
*Disrespects other users
Do NOT let somebody else become an administrator other than us. and do not remove my administrative title while i am gone. If you do that you will be Blocked. Don't delete Winston Churchill either. And also; this is only for a week; neither of you are going to stay an administrator except when i am on break (at least for now).
Do NOT let somebody else become an administrator other than us. and do not remove my administrative title while i am gone. If you do that you will be Blocked. Don't delete Winston Churchill either. And also; this is only for a week; neither of you are going to stay an administrator except when i am on break (at least for now).
Youre officially a full time administratorThat Dawg 21:37, August 28, 2013 (UTC)


==This needs to End==
==This needs to End==
We've been going back and forth on this thing, but the hypocrisy has to be called out. When I made the Churchill page a list of the bad things he did with a link to the good you guys edited it so that it was mainly about the good things he did with links to the good and took out many of the bad things he did. So why is it that your making the Mussolini page 80-90% about the bad things he did? Why is it that you're demonizing Mussolini while glossing over the bad things Churchill did?[[User:Lee-Sensei|Lee-Sensei]] ([[User talk:Lee-Sensei|talk]]) 01:26, August 7, 2013 (UTC)
We've been going back and forth on this thing, but the hypocrisy has to be called out. When I made the Churchill page a list of the bad things he did with a link to the good you guys edited it so that it was mainly about the good things he did with links to the good and took out many of the bad things he did. So why is it that your making the Mussolini page 80-90% about the bad things he did? Why is it that you're demonizing Mussolini while glossing over the bad things Churchill did?[[User:Lee-Sensei|Lee-Sensei]] ([[User talk:Lee-Sensei|talk]]) 01:26, August 7, 2013 (UTC)
Please stop reverting my edits. It's cear that you don't know as much about him as I do and you're adding incorrect information.[[User:Lee-Sensei|Lee-Sensei]] ([[User talk:Lee-Sensei|talk]]) 11:51, August 12, 2013 (UTC)
Why haven't you replied?[[User:Lee-Sensei|Lee-Sensei]] ([[User talk:Lee-Sensei|talk]]) 11:29, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
==Thanks==
I have read your reply to me; and I will also keep you as administrator.That Dawg 20:48, August 13, 2013 (UTC)
==remember==
you can delete pages too
also; if you feel you may not be on for a while; you can try to find somebody that will be on more frequently to become an administrator too
Also; block any users who plagarise and replace the page; if its relevent at all; with a few sentances- even if they put articles under construction (if it was completely blank at the time).
If somebody creates a blank page again please block them - though less so on their first offenses That Dawg 21:55, August 14, 2013 (UTC)
I hate that they do not have the added categories under recent changes anymoreThat Dawg 01:10, August 17, 2013 (UTC)
== Adolf Hitler ==
Hitler was Christian (catholic). [[User:Jackie de Alarcón|Jackie de Alarcón]] ([[User talk:Jackie de Alarcón|talk]]) 05:12, August 26, 2013 (UTC)
== Paranoid Villains ==
Because it had nothing to do with villainy and was just the same as Villains with Mental Illness. Especially since Paranoia is a mental illness.
[[User:Buddyrichiedonmoochie|Buddyrichiedonmoochie]] ([[User talk:Buddyrichiedonmoochie|talk]]) 19:29, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
I agree. But it felt like a category based on a personality trait.
[[User:Buddyrichiedonmoochie|Buddyrichiedonmoochie]] ([[User talk:Buddyrichiedonmoochie|talk]]) 19:34, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
==Block this==
If a user creates a blank page or a page that has no reasoning on it on why it is a villain; BLOCK them. also; block any plagarisers. To these pages; add any info you can find if its relevant That Dawg 23:23, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
==Gloria Estevan==
Do you think she deserves a page just for having ties to Family in White or whatever its called. And also; do you really see the Cuban dissisent movement as villainous. That Dawg 15:17, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
==OK==
I am on breakThat Dawg 01:26, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
== Barack Obama ==
[[User:Jackie de Alarcón|Jackie de Alarcón]] ([[User talk:Jackie de Alarcón|talk]]) 03:20, September 26, 2013 (UTC) Obama is warmonger for see war as the only form of resolving problems, besides kills of hungry. His country is hegemonic. Obama is president exclusively of United States but his country also has power above Alaska that is geographically and terrestrially separated of Canada, is evil but Rafael Correa of Ecuador fought for good cause. Obama confirmed attack Siria but Vladimir protected it. [[Special:Contributions/190.236.22.81|190.236.22.81]] 23:36, September 28, 2013 (UTC) Obama is guilty for reject Cuba in the Summit of the Americas, his country is republican but his northern neighbor Canada is monarchy, with who had support for reject to Cuba in the Summit of the Americas. [[User:Jackie de Alarcón|Jackie de Alarcón]] ([[User talk:Jackie de Alarcón|talk]]) 23:43, September 28, 2013 (UTC)
== How I see it ==
<span style="color:rgb(95,95,95);font-family:'HelveticaNeue',Helvetica,Arial,san-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:16px;">The good and evil that you see don't even exist in reality, at least not outside of the mind that believes in them. They are only judgments passed by the individual from their own unique perspective. What one person sees as bad or evil may seem to be the only logical thing to do from some other perspective. The ideas of both good and evil are point of view specific. This is why people like Geroge W. Bush and Osama bin laden are either loved or hated. </span>
<span style="color:rgb(95,95,95);font-family:'HelveticaNeue',Helvetica,Arial,san-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:16px;">Bush was seen as good by people who shared his fear based thought system. Those who have a compassionate concern for all of mankind often saw him as evil. </span><span style="color:rgb(95,95,95);font-family:'HelveticaNeue',Helvetica,Arial,san-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:16px;">Bin laden was much the same. He was seen as a villain in much of the western world, but he was somewhat of a celebrated hero in certain parts of the Middle East. There were T-shirt shops that sold items with his picture as though he was Jesus. His demise was a reason for celebration in some circles and a reason for sadness in others. It all depends on your point of view or perspective. </span>
<span style="color:rgb(95,95,95);font-family:'HelveticaNeue',Helvetica,Arial,san-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:16px;">To sum it all up, good is the name we give to people who do things that we think we like. </span>
<span style="color:rgb(95,95,95);font-family:'HelveticaNeue',Helvetica,Arial,san-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:16px;">Evil is the name we give to people who do the things that we don’t like. </span>
<span style="color:rgb(95,95,95);font-family:'HelveticaNeue',Helvetica,Arial,san-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:16px;">This is of course based solely on our particular point of view. </span>
Return to the user page of "General MGD 109".