Editing Westboro Baptist Church
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 162: | Line 162: | ||
On August 2, 2012, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Congress Congress] passed a bill that included restrictions on demonstrators at military funerals, which became law four days later when signed by President Obama. The bill says that for 2 hours before until 2 hours after the funeral service demonstrators must stay at least 300 feet (91 m) away from the boundary of the funeral location and away from the residence of grieving family members. | On August 2, 2012, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Congress Congress] passed a bill that included restrictions on demonstrators at military funerals, which became law four days later when signed by President Obama. The bill says that for 2 hours before until 2 hours after the funeral service demonstrators must stay at least 300 feet (91 m) away from the boundary of the funeral location and away from the residence of grieving family members. | ||
===Supreme Court case=== | ===Supreme Court case=== | ||
On March 10, 2006, WBC picketed the funeral of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Marine Marine] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lance_Corporal Lance Corporal] Matthew A. Snyder in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westminister,_Maryland Westminister, Maryland]<ref>[https://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/facts-and-case-summary-snyder-v-phelps Facts and Case Summary - ''Snyder v. Phelps''], | On March 10, 2006, WBC picketed the funeral of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Marine Marine] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lance_Corporal Lance Corporal] Matthew A. Snyder in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westminister,_Maryland Westminister, Maryland]<ref>[https://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/facts-and-case-summary-snyder-v-phelps Facts and Case Summary - ''Snyder v. Phelps''], U.S. Courts</ref>. The picket was held in a location cordoned off by the police, approximately 1,000 feet (300 m) from the Church, for about 30 minutes before the funeral began. On June 5, 2006, the Snyder family sued for defamation, invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The lawsuit named Albert Snyder, Matthew Snyder's father, as [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plaintiff plaintiff] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Phelps Fred W. Phelps], Sr.; Westboro Baptist Church, Inc.; Rebekah Phelps-Davis; and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shirley_Phelps-Roper Shirley Phelps-Roper] as defendants, alleging that they were responsible for publishing defamatory information about the Snyder family on the Internet, including statements that Albert and his wife had "raised [Matthew] for the devil" and taught him "to defy his Creator, to divorce, and to commit adultery". Other statements denounced them for raising their son Catholic. Snyder further complained the defendants had intruded upon and staged protests at his son's funeral. The claims of invasion of privacy and defamation arising from comments posted about Snyder on the Westboro website were dismissed on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution First Amendment] grounds, but the case proceeded to trial on the remaining three counts.<span style="font-size:11px;line-height:0px;"> </span>At the trial, Albert Snyder testified: | ||
They turned this funeral into a media circus and they wanted to hurt my family. They wanted their message heard and they didn't care who they stepped over. My son should have been buried with dignity, not with a bunch of clowns outside.<span style="font-size:11px;line-height:0px;"> </span>In his instructions to the jury, U.S. District Judge [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_D._Bennett Richard D. Bennett] stated that the First Amendment protection of free speech has limits, including vulgar, offensive and shocking statements, and that the jury must decide "whether the defendant's actions would be highly offensive to a reasonable person, whether they were extreme and outrageous and whether these actions were so offensive and shocking as to not be entitled to First Amendment protection".<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-117">[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westboro_Baptist_Church#cite_note-117 [117]]</sup> See also [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaplinsky_v._New_Hampshire Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire], a case where certain personal slurs and obscene utterances by an individual were found unworthy of First Amendment protection, due to the potential for violence resulting from their utterance. | They turned this funeral into a media circus and they wanted to hurt my family. They wanted their message heard and they didn't care who they stepped over. My son should have been buried with dignity, not with a bunch of clowns outside.<span style="font-size:11px;line-height:0px;"> </span>In his instructions to the jury, U.S. District Judge [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_D._Bennett Richard D. Bennett] stated that the First Amendment protection of free speech has limits, including vulgar, offensive and shocking statements, and that the jury must decide "whether the defendant's actions would be highly offensive to a reasonable person, whether they were extreme and outrageous and whether these actions were so offensive and shocking as to not be entitled to First Amendment protection".<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-117">[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westboro_Baptist_Church#cite_note-117 [117]]</sup> See also [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaplinsky_v._New_Hampshire Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire], a case where certain personal slurs and obscene utterances by an individual were found unworthy of First Amendment protection, due to the potential for violence resulting from their utterance. | ||