Editing Reginald Dyer

{{Villain_Infobox
|Image = General-Reginald-Dyer.jpg
|fullname = Reginald Edward Harry Dyer
|alias = The Butcher of Amritsar
|origin = Murree, Punjab, British India
|occupation = Officer in the armies of the British Raj
|type of villain = War Criminal
|goals = Keep the Indians in check (somewhat successful)<br>Enforce British rule in the region (successful until after the massacre)
|crimes = [[Mass murder]]<br>[[War crimes]]
|hobby = }}
{{Quote|You people know well that I am a Sepoy and soldier. Do you want war or peace? If you wish for a war, the Government is prepared for it, and if you want peace, then obey my orders and open all your shops; else I will shoot. For me the battlefield of France or Amritsar is the same. I am a military man and I will go straight.|Dyer's justification for the massacre.}}
'''Reginald Edward Harry Dyer''' CB (9 October 1864 – 23 July 1927) was an Indian-born officer of the Bengal Army and later the newly constituted Indian Army. His military career began serving briefly in the regular British Army before transferring to serve with the Presidency armies of India.

As a temporary brigadier-general he was responsible for the [[Jallianwala Bagh Massacre|Jallianwala Bagh massacre]] in Amritsar (in the province of Punjab). He has been called '''the Butcher of Amritsar''', because of his order to fire repeatedly on a crowd of peaceful protestors. This resulted in the killing of at least 379 people and the injuring of over a thousand more. Subsequently Dyer was removed from duty and widely condemned both in Britain and India, but he became a celebrated hero among some with connections to the British Raj. Some historians argue the episode was a decisive step towards the end of British rule in India.
==Jallianwala Bagh Massacre==
On Sunday, 13 April 1919, Dyer, convinced a major insurrection could take place, banned all meetings. This notice was not widely disseminated, and many villagers gathered in the Bagh to celebrate the important Sikh festival of Baisakhi, and peacefully protest the arrest and deportation of two national leaders, Satya Pal and Saifuddin Kitchlew. Dyer and his troops entered the garden, blocking the main entrance behind them, took up position on a raised bank, and with no warning opened fire on the crowd for about ten minutes, directing their bullets largely towards the few open gates through which people were trying to flee, until the ammunition supply was almost exhausted. The following day Dyer stated in a report that "I hear that between 200 and 300 of the crowd were killed. My party fired 1,650 rounds".

The Hunter Commission report published the following year by the Government of India criticised both Dyer and the Government of the Punjab for failing to compile a casualty count, and quoted a figure offered by the Sewa Samati (a Social Services Society) of 379 identified dead, and approximately 1,100 wounded, of which 192 were seriously injured. The casualty number estimated by the Indian National Congress was more than 1,500 injured, with approximately 1,000 dead.

Dyer was initially lauded for his actions in Britain and became a hero among many who were directly benefiting from the British Raj, such as members of the House of Lords. He was, however, widely criticised in the House of Commons, whose July 1920 committee of investigation censured him. Because he was a soldier acting on orders, he could not be tried for murder. The military chose not to bring him before a court martial, and he was only removed from his current appointment, turned down for a proposed promotion, and barred from further employment in India. Dyer retired from the army and he returned to England, where he died unrepentant in 1927.

Responses polarized both the English and Indian people. Eminent author Rudyard Kipling declared at the time that Dyer "did his duty as he saw it". This incident shocked Rabindranath Tagore (the first Asian Nobel laureate) to such extent that he stated that "such mass murderers aren't worthy of giving any title to anyone".

The massacre caused a re-evaluation by the British Army of its military role against civilians to minimal force whenever possible, although later British actions during the Mau Mau insurgencies in Kenya have led historian Huw Bennett to note that the new policy was not always carried out. The army was retrained and developed less violent tactics for crowd control.

The level of casual brutality, and lack of accountability "stunned the entire nation", resulting in a "wrenching loss of faith" of the general Indian public in the intentions of the UK. The ineffective inquiry, together with the initial accolades for Dyer, fuelled great widespread anger against the British among the Indian populace, leading to the Non-cooperation Movement of 1920–22.
[[Category:List]]
[[Category:Murderer]]
[[Category:Wealthy]]
[[Category:Military]]
[[Category:Leader]]
[[Category:Political]]
[[Category:Deceased]]
[[Category:Mass Murderers]]
[[Category:Karma Houdini]]
[[Category:Warlords]]
[[Category:Destroyer of Innocence]]
[[Category:Corrupt Officials]]
[[Category:Terrorists]]
[[Category:Xenophobes]]
[[Category:Homicidal]]
[[Category:Sadists]]
[[Category:War Criminal]]
[[Category:Psychopath]]
[[Category:Emotionless Villains]]
[[Category:Brutes]]
[[Category:Barbarians]]
[[Category:Oppressors]]
[[Category:Control Freaks]]
[[Category:Failure-Intolerant]]
[[Category:Mongers]]
[[Category:Slaver]]
[[Category:Supremacists]]
[[Category:Wrathful]]
[[Category:Delusional]]
[[Category:Lawful Evil]]
[[Category:United Kingdom]]
[[Category:Villains of World War 1]]
[[Category:Paranoid]]
[[Category:Arrogant]]
[[Category:Provoker]]