imported>Buddyrichiedonmoochie
Line 364: Line 364:


<p style="margin-top:0.4em;margin-bottom:0.5em;line-height:19.1875px;font-family:sans-serif;">I'd highly recommend PRESUMED GUILTY, How and why the Warren Commission framed Lee Harvey Oswald(1976) </p>
<p style="margin-top:0.4em;margin-bottom:0.5em;line-height:19.1875px;font-family:sans-serif;">I'd highly recommend PRESUMED GUILTY, How and why the Warren Commission framed Lee Harvey Oswald(1976) </p>
== [[Justin Bieber]] photo ==
Get a better photo
[[User:Buddyrichiedonmoochie|Buddyrichiedonmoochie]] ([[User talk:Buddyrichiedonmoochie|talk]]) 17:27, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:27, 26 February 2013

Welcome

Hi, welcome to Real Life Villains Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the Adolf Hitler page.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- AmethystKnight (Talk) 03:34, September 22, 2012

Ivan lost his mother to the boyars when he was a kid, and assassination plots against him were not uncommon, plus he suffered a breakdown when his wife died, so I think he qualifies as a tragic villain, since he initially intended to be a good ruler when she was alive (he claimed to have received a message from God, telling him not to neglect his people). Also, if "Fanatic" is "all that's needed", then why are both Categories on the other Villains wiki? Ivan's religion was his obsession, but fanaticism and religion aren't always the same.Pyromania101 (talk) 22:21, October 12, 2012 (UTC)

No, the "Religious Villains" page WAS deleted on Villains Wiki. However, he still had some control on all his deaths, but maybe i'll add that back. However, its still debatable. Crayzee Dawg 101 (talk) 22:31, October 12, 2012 (UTC)


Oh, I didn't know they did. Huh. Thanks for informing me, though if you think about it, being religious, again, is not always the same as fanatacism.Pyromania101 (talk) 23:04, October 12, 2012 (UTC)

No, but a Fanatic is by Villains Wiki definition a person or organization that uses religion for extremism. Crayzee Dawg 101 (talk) 23:11, October 12, 2012 (UTC)


That doesn't always have to be the definition, though, but if it really bothers you, go ahead and petition for the termination of the Religious Villains page on this site (which I created).

Most Evil

You should check out these Discovery Channel documentaries called "The Most Evil Men and Women in History."

  • Caligula
  • Nero
  • Attila the Hun
  • Bad King John
  • Tomas de Torquemada
  • Francisco Pizarro
  • Elizabeth Bathory (or Countess Dracula)
  • Bloody Mary Tudor
  • Vlad the Impaler
  • Ivan the Terrible
  • Rasputin
  • Josef Stalin
  • Adolf Hitler
  • Ilse Koch
  • Pol Pot
  • Idi Amin

They can all be found on YouTube, except Bathory. I'm kinda disappointed they didn't include Mao, but I guess they didn't want to get too controversial.Pyromania101 (talk) 01:38, October 22, 2012 (UTC)

Most Evil

Kony and Al-Bashir should also be added, along with Islam Karimov

Elizabeth Bathory

She only went after buxom, beautiful virgins because she wanted to "steal their beauty." Adolescent and prepubescent girls were of no interest to her. Also, she was, ironically, a very good mother, so I don't see how she fits the bill of "Child Abuser." I don't wanna argue, but I'd like to see some facts, and I for one think it's a fact that she didn't kill small kids.

It is very likely i believe that she killed many small peasent children, also that she likely killed over 2000 people. Also, the fact that it was common at that time to kill peasent girls did not make it any better. Plus, it said "girls" which is a bit confusing. Crayzee Dawg 101 (talk) 22:26, October 22, 2012 (UTC)

She killed 650 women, or around that number. I guess the term "girls" implied teenage females, or basically any female who was starting to show signs of being a physical jewel. Many of her victims were "hired" as servants in their mid-teens or a bit older, but never as young children.Pyromania101 (talk) 23:01, October 22, 2012 (UTC)

Teen murdering still counts as a child murderer or child abuseCrayzee Dawg 101 (talk) 00:08, October 23, 2012 (UTC)

Graham Young

Hi Crayzee Dawg 101. You put Graham Young under the absolute evil category. Why?

I believe I put him under there due to his method of killing, and plus he killed his OWN family. Normally, the category is not used for serial killers unless they are excessively brutal.Crayzee Dawg 101 (talk) 16:38, November 17, 2012 (UTC)

I see

Buddyrichiedonmoochie (talk) 12:40, November 18, 2012 (UTC)

Nicolae Ceausescu

Oh good. It was the Nicolae Ceausescu page he blanked anyway

Buddyrichiedonmoochie (talk) 17:01, November 18, 2012 (UTC)

Not to be mean or anything but on that message you put on my talk page you sounded like The Great Prince of the Forest. Are there any administrators on this wiki? I think it would be better if 69.112.114.132 was blocked. Or is he already?

Buddyrichiedonmoochie (talk) 17:12, November 18, 2012 (UTC)

Buddy, the Only administrators on here are Amythyst Knight and Inferno Pendragon, and they dont even go on here much, but yeah please send them a message to block this userCrayzee Dawg 101 (talk) 17:14, November 18, 2012 (UTC)

I see. Who blocked him?

Buddyrichiedonmoochie (talk) 17:38, November 18, 2012 (UTC)

List

What is "List"?Pyromania101 (talk) 23:02, November 19, 2012 (UTC)

List includes is to all pages on this websiteCrayzee Dawg 101 (talk) 23:04, November 19, 2012 (UTC)

'Kay. Thanks.Pyromania101 (talk) 23:26, November 19, 2012 (UTC)

Most Iconic Villains List

Most recognizable villains in history

    • Satan

1. Adolf Hitler

2. Adam Lanza

3. Emperor Nero

4. Kim Jong-il

5. Herod the Great

6. Eric Harris

7. Jack the Ripper

8. Fidel Castro

9. Elizabeth Bathory

10. Vlad the Impaler

11. Amon Göth

12. Osama Bin Laden

13. Benedict Arnold

14. Genghis Khan

15. Emperor Hirohito

16. Mao Zedong

17. Saddam Hussein

18. Ghadoffi

19. Blackbeard (Historical)

20. Joseph Stalin

21. Hermann Goring

22. Pol Pot

23. Abu Musab al-Zarqawi

24. Richard Nixon

25. Ivan the Terrible

26. Phalaris

27. Rameses

28. Timothy McVeigh

29. Joseph McCarthy

30. Mahmoud Ahmendajad

31. Benito Mussolini

32. Gilles de Rais

33. Attila the Hun

34. Fred Phelps

35. Seung-Hui Cho

36. Dylan Klebold

37. Lee Harvey Oswald

38. Oliver Cromwell

39. Ted Bundy

40. Napoleon

41. Joseph Goebbels

42. Jeffery Dahmer

43. Anton Szandor LaVey

44. Ayman al-Zawahiri

45. Adolf Eichmann

46. Peter Sutcliffe

47. Harold Shipman

48. Vladimir Lenin

49. Joseph Kony

50. Robert Edward Chambliss

51. Hugo Chavez

52. Ze Pequino

53. George Zimmerman

54. Bloody Mary Tudor

55. Francisco Franco

56. Nathan Bedford Forrest

57. Jared Lee Loughner

58. John Wilkes Booth

59. Gary Ridgway

60. James Earl Ray

61. Ted Kaczynski

62. Eugene Talmadge

63. Omar al-Bashir

64. Mohammed Atta

65. Kim Jong-un

66. O.J Simpson

67. Chief McIntosh

68. Ahmed Sekou Toure

69. Idi Amin Dada

70. Rodney Alcala

71. Ratu Udre Udre

72. Bashir Al - Assad

73. Augusto Pinochet

74. Hosni Mubarak

75. Caligula

76. Jim Jones

77. Jean-Bédel Bokassa

78. Saint Dominic

79. Elijah Muhammed

80. King George III

81. Joseph Mobutu See Sico

82. Kim Ill-Sung

83. Hernando Cortez

84. Commodus

85. Plutarco Elias Calles

86. Terry Nichols

87. Carl Panzram

88. 

Abdullah of Saudi Arabia

If he did some good things why was he under the :Absolute Evil category and then Big Bads?

Buddyrichiedonmoochie (talk) 14:37, December 28, 2012 (UTC)

I did

Buddyrichiedonmoochie (talk) 16:56, December 28, 2012 (UTC)

Big bads

I didn't create Big Bads.

Buddyrichiedonmoochie (talk) 16:51, December 29, 2012 (UTC)

I know but there's a different meaning to it. An evil ruler may be a ruler or a king but a Tyrant is a cruel king.

Buddyrichiedonmoochie (talk) 17:16, December 29, 2012 (UTC)

Well is a king but uses dictator style methods. Anyway even if Idi Amin wasn't royalty he was still a tyrant because don't forget he killed loads of people

Buddyrichiedonmoochie (talk) 17:23, December 29, 2012 (UTC)

Alright

Buddyrichiedonmoochie (talk) 17:26, December 29, 2012 (UTC)


A xenophobe is someone who isn't just racist but someone who is intolerant of all ethnic groups

Joining Skippy Shorts Wiki

Crayzee Dawg 101, would you like to join the Skippy Shorts Wiki at this link?

http://www.skippyshorts.wikia.com/

If you don't know who he is, check him out on YouTube!

HIS MAIN CHANNEL:

http://www.youtube.com/user/skippyshorts

HIS SECOND CHANNEL:

http://www.youtube.com/user/skippythe2nd

That wiki needs serious help, you know! -- TheSitcomLover 1:02, January 13, 2013 (UTC)

Hu Jintao

What was Hu Jintao accused of doing?

Buddyrichiedonmoochie (talk) 17:01, January 13, 2013 (UTC)

10 Worst Dictators

10. Meles Zanawi

9. Robert Mugabe

8. King Mswanti II

7. Yahya Jemmah

6. Yoweki Kalibula Musevini

5. Bashir Al-Assad (possibly #1)

4. Islam Karimov

3. Desi Bouterse

2. Isaias Afwerki

1. Omar Al-Bashir

And your telling people this because?

Buddyrichiedonmoochie (talk) 14:56, January 26, 2013 (UTC)

Anti Villain improvement

Thank you

Buddyrichiedonmoochie (talk) 21:25, January 25, 2013 (UTC)

Lee Oswald

I propse we shall delete the Oswald page. Because there is evidence that Oswald was innocent of JFK's murder(yes, I believe in conspiracy) and 2:

While it is true that many people claim there is enough evidence that Oswald did shoot Kenendy and while this is the iconic image which has remained of Oswald, that what the Lone gunman theory is...... a theory.

In reality Oswald has NEVER been confirmed to be the murderer of Kenendy, nor has he EVER been confirmed to be the murderer of Tippit. WC defenders maintain that the case against Oswald is airtight, and that were he to stand trial today he would be found guilty of the assassination.

Critics of the WC, on the other hand, assert that Oswald was framed, that the case against him is flawed at almost every point, and that an impartial jury would acquit him in a trial where the normal legal standards of evidence were applied. In their view, not only is there far more than a reasonable doubt about Oswald's guilt, but the available evidence shows he did not shoot the President. Most WC critics also believe that Kennedy was killed as the result of a conspiracy.

George De Mohrenschildt (9 H 255) testified that Oswald was an admirer of President Kennedy and had praised him, considered Oswald a man "with no hatred in him."

So why was Oswald put on here? Since Oswald denied killing anyone and since there is still theroies on the Assassination of JFK, I don't see why it could translate to this article.

I'd highly recommend PRESUMED GUILTY, How and why the Warren Commission framed Lee Harvey Oswald(1976) 

Justin Bieber photo

Get a better photo

Buddyrichiedonmoochie (talk) 17:27, February 26, 2013 (UTC)